文章摘要
浮针治疗腰背肌筋膜炎的临床疗效观察
Clinical Observation of Fu"s Subcutaneous Needling in Treatment ofLumbar and Back Myofascitis
投稿时间:2019-05-15  录用日期:2019-07-10
DOI:
中文关键词: 浮针  腰背肌筋膜炎  疏松的结缔组织
英文关键词: Fu"s subcutaneous needling  Lumbar and back myofascitis  Soft connective tissue
基金项目:黑龙江中医药大学“优秀创新人才支持计划”(2018RCD10);国家中医药管理局第四批全国中医(临床、基础)优秀人才研修项目(国中医药人教发[2017]24)
作者单位E-mail
毕海洋 黑龙江中医药大学附属第一医院 boris933@126.com 
马琳 黑龙江中医药大学  
于楠楠 黑龙江中医药大学附属第一医院  
刘鹏 黑龙江中医药大学附属第一医院  
刘征 黑龙江中医药大学 liuzheng_happy@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 65
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 观察浮针治疗腰背肌筋膜炎30例的临床疗效。方法 将符合标准的患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组患者30例。两组均治疗1周,观察组给予浮针治疗,2天1次,观察周期内共治疗3次;对照组给予常规针刺治疗,每日1次,观察周期内共治疗6次。比较治疗前、治疗1次及治疗1周后两组的简式麦吉尔疼痛问卷表 (MPQ)疼痛评分及功能障碍指数(ODI),并对两组临床疗效进行比较。结果 与对照组比较,无论是治疗1次后还是治疗1周后,观察组MPQ总分均明显降低(P<0.05,P<0.01),观察组优于对照组;观察组ODI评分均显著降低(P<0.05),且观察组优于对照组。观察组总有效率为96.6%,高于对照组的86.6%。结论 在镇痛、改善功能方面,浮针治疗腰背肌筋膜炎疗效较常规针刺好。
英文摘要:
      Objective To observe the clinical effect of Fu"s subcutaneous needling in the treatment of 30 cases of lumbar and back myofascitis. Methods Patients who met the criteria were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 30 patients in each group. The two groups were treated for 1 week. The observation group was given Fu"s subcutaneous needling treatment, once every 2 days, and treated for 3 times during the observation period. The control group was given conventional acupuncture treatment once a day, for 6 times during such period. The Jane McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) pain score and dysfunction index (ODI) were compared between the two groups before treatment, once as well as one week after treatment, and the clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared. Results Compared with the control group,after the first time treatment or after 1 week of treatment, the total MPQ scores of the observation group were significantly lower (P<0.05, P<0.01); the ODI scores of the observation group were significantly lower (P<0.05), in addition, the observation group was superior to the control group.The total effective rate of the observation group was 96.6%, which was higher than 86.6% of the control group. Conclusion In the aspect of analgesia and improvement of function, Fu"s subcutaneous needling treatment of lumbar and back myofascitis is better than conventional acupuncture.
View Fulltext   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信公众号
分享按钮