文章摘要
穴位电刺激分娩镇痛对新生儿脐动静脉血气的影响
The Analgesic Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation on Labor Analgesia and its Effect on Neonatal Umbilical Arteriovenous Blood gas
投稿时间:2019-06-06  录用日期:2019-08-15
DOI:
中文关键词: 分娩镇痛  穴位电刺激  脐动脉血  脐静脉血  血气分析
英文关键词: Labor analgesia  Transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation (TEAS)  Umbilical artery and vein blood  Blood gas analysis
基金项目:福建中医药大学临床专项课题(XB2017019)
作者单位邮编
吴雅婷 福建中医药大学附属第二人民医院 350003
杨代和* 福建中医药大学附属第二人民医院 350003
摘要点击次数: 26
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 观察经皮穴位电刺激(TEAS)用于分娩镇痛的镇痛效果,探究TEAS镇痛对新生儿的动静脉血气的影响。方法 收集符合纳入标准的产妇80例,随机分为电刺激组和对照组各40例。两组在临产开始时予导乐陪伴,电刺激组使用穴位电刺激仪刺激产妇双侧合谷、三阴交、夹脊穴(L3-L5段),直至胎儿娩出,对照组除导乐陪伴外未予其他镇痛干预。在镇痛过程中,分别记录两组镇痛前(T0)、镇痛后30min(T1)、镇痛后1h(T2)、宫口开全(T3)、胎儿娩出后(T4)的VAS评分,评估镇痛效果。分娩后抽取两组新生儿脐动、静脉血各1.5送检,进行血气分析,并记录新生儿1min、5min、10min时Apgar评分。收集VAS评分、血气分析结果和Apgar评分进行统计比较。结果 对照组因低体重儿脱落2例,最后收集符合要求产妇共78例,电刺激组40例,对照组38例。电刺激组组内比较,T1与T2时 VAS评分低于T0( ),T3与T0时VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义( ),T4 时VAS评分低于T0( );对照组组内比较,T1、T2与T0时VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义( ),T3时VAS评分高于T0( ),T4时VAS评分低于T0( );电刺激组与对照组组间比较,T0时VAS评分两组间差异无统计学意义( ),T1、T2、T3与T4时VAS评分电刺激组低于对照组( );镇痛有效率比较,电刺激组高于对照组( )。电刺激组脐动、静脉血pH值、BE值和PO2高于对照组( ),Lac值低于对照组( ),PCO2与对照组相比差异无统计学意义( );电刺激组脐动静脉血pH、BE、PO2 、PCO2和Lac差值(Δ=A-V)与对照组相比差异无统计学意义( )。镇痛组新生儿出生时第1、5和10min 的Apgar评分与对照组相比差异无统计学意义( >0.05)。结论 TEAS应用于分娩镇痛临床效果确切,同时能改善新生儿脐动静脉血气,减少乳酸堆积,有助于减少新生儿酸中毒和新生儿窒息的发生。
英文摘要:
      Objective To study the analgesic effect of transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation(TEAS) on labor analgesia and the influence of neonatal umbilical artery and venous blood gas and lactic acid. Methods In this study, 80 parturients who met the inclusion criteria were collected and randomly divided into the electric stimulation group and the control group with 40 cases each The two groups were accompanied by the professional personnel to Doula at the beginning of labor, using the acupuncture electric stimulator for the electric stimulation group of maternal bilateral Hegu, Sanyin-jiao and Jiaji(L3、L5 points), keep electrical stimulation, until the fetal childbirth.The control group, no other analgesic intervention was given except Doula. VAS scores of the two groups were recorded respectively before analgesia or Doula(T0), 30 minutes after analgesia or Doula(T1), 1 hour after analgesia or Doula(T2),and after cervix opened(T3), and after fetal delivery(T4) to evaluate analgesic effect. After delivery,1.5 ml samples of umbilical artery and venous blood were taken from the two groups for blood gas analysis, and Apgar scores at 1min, 5min and 10min were recorded. VAS score,blood gas analysis and Apgar score were collected for statistical comparison. Results Case collection results: 2 cases of low-weight infants were lost in the control group, and a total of 78 cases of eligible mothers were collected in the end, including 40 cases in the electrical stimulation group and 38 cases in the control group. In the electrical stimulation group, the VAS score at T1,T2 was lower than T0( ), there was no statistically significant difference between T3 and T0 ( ) , and at T4 was lower than T0 ( ).In the control group, there was no statistically significant difference between T1, T2 and T0 ( ) about the VAS score, and VAS score at T3 was higher than T0 ( ),and the score at T4 was lower than T0 ( ). Comparison between the electrical stimulation group and the control group: there was no statistically significant difference in VAS score at T0 between the two groups ( ), and the VAS score at T1, T2, T3 and T4 in the electrical stimulation group was lower than the control group ( ). Comparison of analgesic efficiency: the electric stimulation group was higher than the control group ( ). Results of arteriovenous blood gas:the pH, BE and PO2 of umbilical artery and venous blood in the electrical stimulation group were higher than those in the control group ( ), and the Lac was lower than that in the control group ( ).There was no statistically significant difference in PCO2 between the two groups( ).The difference of umbilical artery and venous blood pH, BE, PO2, PCO2 and Lac(Δ=A-V)in electrical stimulation group was no statistically significant difference compared with control group ( ). Apgar score results: there was no significant difference between the electrical stimulation group and the control group in Apgar score at 1, 5 and 10 minutes after birth ( ). Conclusion TEAS is an effective analgesic treatment in labor analgesia, which can improve blood gas in umbilical artery and venous, reduce lactic acid accumulation, and contributes to reducing the occurrence of neonatal acidosis and asphyxia.
View Fulltext   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信公众号
分享按钮